Home Adult entertainment Britney Spears’ lawyer files slamming new documents Jamie Spears | Entertainment

Britney Spears’ lawyer files slamming new documents Jamie Spears | Entertainment


Britney Spears’ attorney has filed legal documents accusing her father of “engaging in horrific and unacceptable invasions of his adult daughter’s privacy.”

Mathew Rosengart filed documents with Los Angeles Superior Court on Monday (09/27/21), in which he said “the chickens really came home to roost” following a “briefing at the bomb “from the New York Times, which claimed that Jamie Spears recorded her daughter’s communications without her permission.

In a file obtained by Page Six of the New York Post, the attorney said, “Specifically, the Times reported that he and others” were operating an intense surveillance apparatus that monitored [Ms. Spears’s] communications’ and also captured attorney-client communications with his former attorney, which communications are a sacrosanct part of the legal system. “

He also claimed that what was “even more shocking” was that Jamie – who is the 39-year-old pop star’s co-business co-curator – “crossed unfathomable lines” by allegedly “illegally capturing audio recordings of Britney’s bedroom, including private recordings. communications with his children, “which he called a” shameful violation “of the rights of the” Circus “hitmaker.

The attorney told the outlet in a statement: “Unauthorized recording or monitoring of Britney’s private communications – particularly attorney-client communications, which are a sacrosanct part of the legal system – is a violation. inadmissible and shameful of his rights to privacy and a striking example of the deprivation of his civil liberties.

He added: “Placing a listening device in Britney’s bedroom would be particularly gruesome and corroborate much of her compelling and poignant testimony. Mr. Spears has crossed unfathomable lines.

The documents pointed out that Britney’s home state of California is a “bipartisan” consent zone, meaning those who do the registration and those who are registered must give permission.

And Mathew claimed the allegations would distract Jamie from acting in Britney’s best interests, adding it to his arguments as to why he wants him to be removed as a Tory by September 29, when a court decision must take place.

He argued: “Because of these deeply troubling allegations, Mr. Spears will inevitably focus over the next few days and weeks on defending his own interests and not those of his daughter (again).”

Mathew – who has previously argued that Jamie should be fired because he could “hinder” negotiations for the prenuptial agreement of Britney and her fiance Sam Asghari, he has a bad financial history and the mother of his client, Lynne Spears, and temporary curator Jodi Montgomery also want him to leave – wants to question the “Stronger” singer’s father but expects him to invoke Fifth Amendment law against self-incrimination.

He said in the file: “Even assuming Mr. Spears invokes the Fifth Amendment when testifying, he would still be required to answer questions, which would inform the Court’s rulings on these accounting and financial matters in the course of his testimony. ‘an evidentiary hearing in the future.

“At the same time, the mere invocation of the Fifth Amendment would be very enlightening and also allow the court or jury to draw an unfavorable conclusion based on that invocation. “